My Review of Ian McEwan’s The Children Act

I’m taking a break from THE HAPPINESS PLOT in order to link to my review, which appeared this past weekend on The Catholic Thing, of Ian McEwan’s new novel, The Children Act.

In James Joyce’s short story, “The Dead,” Gabriel and Gretta Conroy are in a marriage grown cold. One night after a Christmas party Gabriel seeks to rekindle some of their passion. But Gretta is distracted by a song she had heard at the party, The Lass of Aughrim. When Gabriel presses her for her reasons for being so distracted by this song, Gretta admits that it was a song that used to be sung by a young man, Michael Furey, whom she was “great with” as a girl. Gabriel angrily asks Gretta if she is still in love with this Michael Furey. “He is dead,” Gretta explains. “He died when he was only seventeen. Isn’t it a terrible thing to die so young as that?” Gabriel, humiliated “by the evocation of this figure from the dead, a boy in the gasworks,” asks how Michael Furey died.

Gretta answers: “I think he died for me.”

The specter of Joyce’s Michael Furey came to me as I read Ian McEwan’s captivating, elegantly written, and disturbing new novel, The Children Act.

To continue reading the review just follow this link

*The image of London above is reproduced courtesy of Mewiki at Wikimedia Commons under the following license.

Happy Birthday, P.G. Wodehouse

“Mr. Wodehouse’s idyllic world can never stale. He will continue to release future generations from captivity that may be more irksome than our own.” — Evelyn Waugh

Speaking from the vantage point of one of those future generations, I say, “Only too true, Mr. Waugh, only too true.”

P.G. Wodehouse’s influence upon my own work has been both immense and grossly insufficient, and so today I say a prayer and raise a glass in his honor, for his repose, and in a spirit of renewed dedication to the example of his work.

Happy Birthday, P.G. Wodehouse, you were and are The Master. (October 15, 1881-February 14, 1975).

By way of celebration, enjoy the following toothsome tid-bits:

The Official P.G. Wodehouse Website

A snippet from a BBC documentary

This appreciation from Wodehouse biographer Robert McCrumb

And this brief appreciation by Stephen Fry:

Reading David Mitchell’s “The Bone Clocks” Through O’Connor

On the surface there doesn’t seem to be much connection between the work of David Mitchell and that of Flannery O’Connor. Yet as I meander my way through Mitchell’s new novel, The Bone Clocks (no spoilers, please, I’m not finished yet), I keep thinking of what O’Connor says in her essay, “Some Aspects of the Grotesque in Southern Fiction”:

“Hawthorne knew his own problems and perhaps anticipated ours when he said he did not write novels, he wrote romances.”

According to O’Connor, by writing romances Hawthorne “was trying to keep for fiction some of its freedom from social determinisms, and steer it in the direction of poetry.”

Is this what Mitchell is doing with the jarring interjections of camp Dr. Who sci-fi that disrupt the otherwise up-market narrative style of The Bone Clocks? Is he, in his own fashion, attempting to break free from the social determinisms that typically serve as the backdrop of contemporary literary fiction and indicate something of the mystery of human existence?

“What if…what if heaven is real, but only in moments?” wonders one of Mitchell’s protagonists, a 15 year-old sexually promiscuous girl who has run away from home after an argument with her mother.

“S’pose heaven’s not like a painting that’s just hanging there forever, but more like…the best song anyone ever wrote, but a song you catch in snatches, while you’re alive, from passing cars, or…upstairs windows when you’re lost…”

Perhaps the space opera that will, I gather, eventually take center stage in The Bone Clocks will somehow help gather up the snatches of this song. Or otherwise signal a depth to reality too often missing in the realisms of literary fiction. Perhaps.

We’ll have to see.